San Lorenzo Colossal Head 2
before about 900 BCE
- Historical locator
- San Lorenzo’s major Gulf Coast florescence
- Present-day locator
- San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán archaeological site, Veracruz, Mexico
- Place relation
- Found at
GeMarkt Art History Atlas
Learn how to look, research, compare, and connect art histories across regions and time.
Six transferable methods and a complete 48-chapter global atlas built around objects, evidence, material, institutions, and movement.

Choose your entrance
The Atlas has an order, not a gate. Learn one transferable method, enter the chronology at its beginning, or explore Atlas I through place and time.
The connected chronology
Move across time through objects, cities, rituals, materials, and institutions. The sequence makes comparison possible without forcing every culture onto one European clock.
Open chapter Published syllabus
This line organises the syllabus; it does not claim that one culture simply follows another. All 54 chapters are published links; the route creates no empty pages.
Atlas I · Space & Time
Fifty sourced object and site records connect the ten open Atlas I chapters without inventing modern borders, exact findspots, or a single universal clock.
Choose Map to explore reviewed locations, or Timeline to follow the same records in chronological order.
Space · evidence-led locations
Only source-supported locations are plotted. The borderless basemap is an orientation aid, not a reconstruction of historical territory.
Selected map cluster · 5 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
before about 900 BCE
probably Classic period, approximately 200–550 CE
776 CE
fifteenth century
probably late fifteenth–early sixteenth century
Selected map cluster · 2 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
probably first millennium BCE
probably about 100 BCE–650 CE; exact date unknown
Selected map record
about 9,300–1,300 years ago
Selected map cluster · 5 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
second quarter of the sixth century BCE
about 40,000 years ago
around 460 BCE
ca. 50–40 BCE
dedicated 113 CE
Selected map record
about 77,000 years ago
Selected map cluster · 8 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
2700–2500 BCE
ca. 590–580 BCE
about 1900 BCE onward
ca. 530 BCE
beginning of the sixteenth century BCE
1600–1450 BCE
late fourth century BCE
around 1250 BCE
Selected map cluster · 7 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
ca. 2446–2389 BCE
ca. 1981–1975 BCE
ca. 1473–1458 BCE
9600–8200 BCE
1353–1347 BCE
ca. 1050 BCE
ca. 125–150 CE
Selected map cluster · 4 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
ca. 2900–2600 BCE
ca. 2039 BCE
ca. 883–859 BCE
ca. 604–562 BCE
Selected map cluster · 4 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
begun in the third century BCE and enlarged and ornamented across later centuries
about second century CE
early fifth century CE
late fifth century CE
Selected map cluster · 2 records
Choose any record in this projected cluster. The grouping describes screen proximity only.
13th–11th century BCE
late third century BCE
Coordinates are published only when the reviewed record supports them. Controls within a fixed distance in the Equal Earth viewbox are grouped deterministically; no location is inferred from a modern country or from a neighbouring record. Below 1080px, the same controls form a touch-safe map-area index beneath the basemap. Land and coastline come from the credited Natural Earth public-domain basemap; modern political borders are intentionally omitted.
Complete map alternative
39 of 50 records mapped; 11 records remain unmapped because reviewed coordinate evidence is insufficient. This list remains complete with or without the visual map.
about 77,000 years ago
Engraved ochre from dated cave layers supports deliberate mark-making, but the surviving pattern has no recoverable translation.
Evidence records
about 40,000 years ago
The mammoth-ivory hybrid was recovered in the cave, while its long reconstruction remains part of the object’s modern biography.
Evidence records
about 9,300–1,300 years ago
Overlapping hand stencils, animals, and hunting scenes form a long multi-phase sequence rather than one pictured event.
Evidence records
Carved pillars and enclosures bind image to communal architecture across a long sequence of construction, use, and rebuilding.
Evidence records
about 2500 BCE
The flame-style cooking vessel joins use and visual excess, but its exact findspot is unrecorded and its displayed base belongs to another vessel.
Evidence records
ca. 2900–2600 BCE
A standing worshiper placed in the Square Temple maintained votive attention beyond the duration of a visitor’s prayer.
Evidence records
ca. 2250–2150 BCE
A named official’s small carved seal made an image and inscription reproducible without preserving a verified workshop or findspot.
Evidence records
ca. 2039 BCE
A dated livestock account written at Puzrish-Dagan binds animals, named responsibility, calculation, and calendar in clay.
Evidence records
ca. 883–859 BCE
A colossal lamassu made for the Northwest Palace joined image, inscription, and threshold to choreograph an imperial encounter.
Evidence records
ca. 604–562 BCE
The glazed lion panel belonged to a repeated Processional Way programme whose colour and scale organised a ceremonial urban route.
Evidence records
ca. 2446–2389 BCE
A chapel first made for Neferiretnes was reassigned to Raemkai, where images, text, and offerings sustained a named funerary presence.
Evidence records
ca. 1981–1975 BCE
The granary model came from a hidden tomb chamber and turns stored grain, labour, and accounting into lasting funerary provision.
Evidence records
ca. 1473–1458 BCE
A colossal kneeling statue was made for the temple processional route, using established royal signs to enact Hatshepsut’s office.
Evidence records
1353–1347 BCE
A small talatat block belonged to the early Aten building programme at Karnak, where reform changed image, ritual space, and construction together.
Evidence records
ca. 1050 BCE
Nauny’s papyrus combines named text and image to prepare her for judgment, and its find context is her burial inside TT358.
Evidence records
The marble figure’s Early Cycladic identity is stronger than its undocumented exact findspot, while lost surface treatment complicates modern whiteness.
Evidence records
about 1900 BCE onward
At the North Entrance, ancient remains, twentieth-century restoration, and a modern fresco copy make preservation visibly part of the image.
Evidence records
beginning of the sixteenth century BCE
The locally distinctive kymbe came from Room 7 of the House of the Ladies, joining marine and terrestrial imagery in one vessel.
Evidence records
The rhyton was found in the Little Palace at Knossos, but only one steatite side survives and the horns and other half are modern reconstruction.
Evidence records
around 1250 BCE
The Lion Gate joined massive fortification, controlled approach, and relief imagery long before later epic names shaped its reception.
Evidence records
ca. 590–580 BCE
An Attic kouros marked an aristocratic grave through a formal standing body, while its exact workshop and grave remain unrecorded.
Evidence records
An official Panathenaic prize vessel carried valuable oil and a regulated civic image beyond the festival that commissioned it.
Evidence records
around 460 BCE
The great Doric temple at Poseidonia was completed around 460 BCE, while its familiar Neptune and Hera names do not settle its dedication.
Evidence records
late fourth century BCE
The theatre belonged to the Asklepios sanctuary, where performance formed part of festivals within a wider healing and pilgrimage system.
Evidence records
second century BCE / 14–68 CE
The surviving marble is a Roman-period copy whose body, material, and setting cannot be collapsed into the lost Hellenistic model.
Evidence records
second quarter of the sixth century BCE
Ancient fittings from an elite ceremonial vehicle survive on a modern support; the map marks the discovery locality, not the exact tomb.
Evidence records
late first century BCE
An unnamed sitter uses an aged, politically charged portrait language; the original setting and findspot remain unpublished.
Evidence records
A painted bedroom opens into imaginary architecture while its modern reconstruction and the estate labour outside the image remain visible limits.
dedicated 113 CE
A fixed forum monument spirals an official conquest narrative around a column dedicated in 113 CE.
ca. 125–150 CE
Local limestone, Palmyrene dress and Aramaic naming frame mourning within Roman rule; the exact family tomb is unknown.
Evidence records
about 2600–1900 BCE
A small seal joins animal, signs and administration; both the “incense burner” reading and the exact findspot remain uncertain.
Evidence records
begun in the third century BCE and enlarged and ornamented across later centuries
A relic mound accumulated Mauryan beginnings, later enlargements and gateway sculpture; this route stop is explicitly multi-phase.
Evidence records
about second century CE
A fragmentary sacred head remains between Buddha and Jain Tirthankara identifications; Mathura is an attribution, not an excavated workshop.
Evidence records
early fifth century CE
The Cave 5 relief binds deity, rock-cut route and Gupta court landscape without making every surrounding figure equally certain.
late fifth century CE
The Cave 1 painting builds bodhisattva presence through prepared plaster, dim space and a viewer’s approach.
Shang dynasty; no object-specific date published
Inscribed bone makes divination durable, but this fragment has no published findspot, translation or object-specific date beyond a Shang-period attribution.
Evidence records
13th–11th century BCE
An animal-shaped bronze coordinated casting, pouring and ancestral ritual; Anyang remains only a possible museum attribution.
Evidence records
early ninth century BCE
The same twelve-character inscription inside vessel and lid turns a gift into lineage memory; the excavated findspot is unknown.
Evidence records
late third century BCE
Thousands of differentiated clay figures make standardisation and imperial hierarchy visible within a still-incompletely excavated mausoleum.
first–early third century CE
A glazed earthenware tower equipped a tomb with an estate-like world; its excavated tomb and region are unrecorded.
Evidence records
before about 900 BCE
A basalt throne was recarved as an individual monumental face; the site’s major florescence bounds an object dated only before about 900 BCE.
Evidence records
probably Classic period, approximately 200–550 CE
A monumental feline turns painted architecture and viewer movement into one urban experience; its mural-specific date remains approximate.
Evidence records
776 CE
Sixteen rulers encircle stone to legitimise Yax Pasaj through the founder; the inscriptional dedication fixes the monument in 776 CE.
fifteenth century
A folded deerskin history maps names, rites and dynasties; its route pin is only a regional production proxy, never a workshop claim.
Evidence records
probably late fifteenth–early sixteenth century
A monumental Mexica time-and-power relief was excavated in 1790; its proposed date, patron, orientation and use remain disputed.
Evidence records
probably first millennium BCE
An in-situ granite figure joins body, gallery architecture and pilgrimage; its first-millennium date is deliberately broad.
Evidence records
450–175 BCE
Embroidered backbent figures animate a mantle border, but the excavated bundle, named wearer and exact findspot are unknown.
Evidence records
probably about 100 BCE–650 CE; exact date unknown
A line-type hummingbird is terrain rather than a portable image; its exact date is unknown within a broad Nasca-period envelope.
Evidence records
500–800 CE
A mould-made vessel materialises an individual-looking face for ritual use; its original valley, settlement and tomb are unrecorded.
Evidence records
1400–1535 CE
Checkerboard cumbi cloth links body, state reward and controlled weaving; possible modern countries cannot locate its workshop or wearer.
Evidence records
Time · authored chronology
Dates remain in the convention supported by each record. Prehistoric BP ranges are not silently converted into falsely precise calendar years.
Engraved ochre from dated cave layers supports deliberate mark-making, but the surviving pattern has no recoverable translation.
Present-day locator: Blombosfontein coast, Western Cape, South Africa
Date note: The museum’s “about” wording is retained as an approximate BP value.
Place note: The site coordinate does not identify the engraved ochre’s excavation square.
Reviewed evidence
The mammoth-ivory hybrid was recovered in the cave, while its long reconstruction remains part of the object’s modern biography.
Present-day locator: Lone Valley near Herbrechtingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Date note: The museum’s “about” wording is retained as an approximate BP value.
Place note: The cave coordinate does not locate the individual fragments within its deposits.
Reviewed evidence
Carved pillars and enclosures bind image to communal architecture across a long sequence of construction, use, and rebuilding.
Present-day locator: Germuş Mountains near Şanlıurfa, Türkiye
Date note: UNESCO supplies a site-wide range rather than a date for one enclosure.
Place note: The coordinate locates the archaeological site rather than a single enclosure.
Reviewed evidence
Overlapping hand stencils, animals, and hunting scenes form a long multi-phase sequence rather than one pictured event.
Present-day locator: Pinturas River Canyon, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina
Date note: The UNESCO sequence spans many phases; its bounds are not dates for every image.
Place note: The coordinate locates the rock-art site, not an individual painted concentration.
Reviewed evidence
A standing worshiper placed in the Square Temple maintained votive attention beyond the duration of a visitor’s prayer.
Present-day locator: Tell Asmar archaeological site near Baqubah, Diyala Governorate, Iraq
Date note: The collection record’s approximate range is retained without added precision.
Place note: The structured coordinate is low precision and does not locate the Square Temple doorway.
Reviewed evidence
The marble figure’s Early Cycladic identity is stronger than its undocumented exact findspot, while lost surface treatment complicates modern whiteness.
Present-day locator: Cyclades, Aegean Sea, Greece (regional locator only)
Date note: The collection record supplies a period range rather than an exact production year.
Place note: The plotted point is a regional Cyclades locator, not an object origin or findspot.
Reviewed evidence
A small seal joins animal, signs and administration; both the “incense burner” reading and the exact findspot remain uncertain.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives only “Indus Valley”
Date note: The interval follows the Met’s broad Mature Harappan catalogue attribution, not an object-specific excavated date.
Place note: “Indus Valley” is a broad study region, not an excavated site; Dholavira or another city must not be invented as the findspot.
Reviewed evidence
The flame-style cooking vessel joins use and visual excess, but its exact findspot is unrecorded and its displayed base belongs to another vessel.
Present-day locator: Japan (museum geography only; no verified object-level origin)
Date note: The museum gives an approximate date without a narrower production year.
Place note: No point is plotted because the museum record does not publish a findspot or workshop.
Reviewed evidence
A chapel first made for Neferiretnes was reassigned to Raemkai, where images, text, and offerings sustained a named funerary presence.
Present-day locator: Saqqara archaeological zone, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Date note: The collection record’s approximate range is retained without added precision.
Place note: The Saqqara coordinate is locality-scale, not the chapel’s excavated footprint.
Reviewed evidence
A named official’s small carved seal made an image and inscription reproducible without preserving a verified workshop or findspot.
Present-day locator: Mesopotamia (collection geography only; no verified object-level point)
Date note: The collection record’s approximate range is retained without added precision.
Place note: No imperial or regional centroid substitutes for an unrecorded object origin.
Reviewed evidence
A dated livestock account written at Puzrish-Dagan binds animals, named responsibility, calculation, and calendar in clay.
Present-day locator: Tell Drehem, Al-Qadisiyyah Governorate, Iraq
Date note: The Met’s approximate calendar conversion is retained as a circa year.
Place note: The archaeological-site point does not identify the tablet’s original administrative room.
Reviewed evidence
The granary model came from a hidden tomb chamber and turns stored grain, labour, and accounting into lasting funerary provision.
Present-day locator: Southern Asasif in the Theban necropolis, Luxor, Egypt
Date note: The collection record’s approximate range is retained without added precision.
Place note: The structured tomb coordinate is coarse and does not locate the hidden chamber.
Reviewed evidence
At the North Entrance, ancient remains, twentieth-century restoration, and a modern fresco copy make preservation visibly part of the image.
Present-day locator: Knossos archaeological site, Crete, Greece
Date note: The authored open-ended label is retained; machine bounds encode the Ministry’s 19th–14th-century BCE palace phases, not every visible intervention.
Place note: The site coordinate anchors Knossos, not the precise centre of the restored North Entrance.
Reviewed evidence
The locally distinctive kymbe came from Room 7 of the House of the Ladies, joining marine and terrestrial imagery in one vessel.
Present-day locator: Akrotiri archaeological site, Santorini, Greece
Date note: The machine interval conservatively encodes the whole sixteenth century; the authored word “beginning” is not converted into an invented decade.
Place note: The site point does not identify Room 7 within the settlement.
Reviewed evidence
The rhyton was found in the Little Palace at Knossos, but only one steatite side survives and the horns and other half are modern reconstruction.
Present-day locator: Knossos archaeological site, Crete, Greece
Date note: The museum supplies a production range rather than an exact year.
Place note: The building coordinate does not identify the object’s position within the Little Palace.
Reviewed evidence
Inscribed bone makes divination durable, but this fragment has no published findspot, translation or object-specific date beyond a Shang-period attribution.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives no findspot
Date note: This is the museum’s broad period attribution, not an object-specific archaeological date.
Place note: Yinxu must not be assigned merely because the better-documented late Shang oracle-bone corpus was excavated there.
Reviewed evidence
A colossal kneeling statue was made for the temple processional route, using established royal signs to enact Hatshepsut’s office.
Present-day locator: Deir el-Bahri, Luxor, Egypt
Date note: The interval follows the current Met object record and remains approximate.
Place note: The monument point locates the temple, not the statue’s reconstructed original position.
Reviewed evidence
A small talatat block belonged to the early Aten building programme at Karnak, where reform changed image, ritual space, and construction together.
Present-day locator: Karnak Temple Complex, Luxor, Egypt
Date note: The collection record supplies an object date range rather than an exact year.
Place note: The temple-complex point does not reconstruct the talatat’s original wall position.
Reviewed evidence
An animal-shaped bronze coordinated casting, pouring and ancestral ritual; Anyang remains only a possible museum attribution.
Present-day locator: Yinxu near Anyang, Henan, China, used only as a possible locality proxy
Date note: The machine bounds expand the Met’s 13th–11th-century BCE catalogue wording; no exact production year is asserted.
Place note: The Met says “possibly Anyang”; this coordinate is not an excavated findspot or confirmed workshop.
Reviewed evidence
The Lion Gate joined massive fortification, controlled approach, and relief imagery long before later epic names shaped its reception.
Present-day locator: Mycenae archaeological site, Argolis, Greece
Date note: The Ministry’s “around” wording is retained as an approximate year.
Place note: Structured monument coordinate for the gate itself.
Reviewed evidence
A basalt throne was recarved as an individual monumental face; the site’s major florescence bounds an object dated only before about 900 BCE.
Present-day locator: San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán archaeological site, Veracruz, Mexico
Date note: The bounded machine interval uses INAH’s 1200–900 BCE San Lorenzo florescence; the authored object date remains only a terminus.
Place note: The coordinate identifies the three-part archaeological-site area, not the 1945 discovery trench.
Reviewed evidence
Nauny’s papyrus combines named text and image to prepare her for judgment, and its find context is her burial inside TT358.
Present-day locator: Deir el-Bahri in the Theban necropolis, Luxor, Egypt
Date note: The collection record gives an approximate year and no narrower date.
Place note: No reliable structured point for TT358 was found; the plotted coordinate is explicitly Deir el-Bahri complex-level.
Reviewed evidence
An in-situ granite figure joins body, gallery architecture and pilgrimage; its first-millennium date is deliberately broad.
Present-day locator: Lanzón Gallery, Chavín de Huántar archaeological site, Ancash, Peru
Date note: Stanford dates Chavín broadly to around 1000–200 BCE; the authored object wording intentionally avoids false precision.
Place note: The sculpture remains in situ; the coordinate identifies its gallery location within the monument.
Reviewed evidence
The same twelve-character inscription inside vessel and lid turns a gift into lineage memory; the excavated findspot is unknown.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives no excavated findspot
Date note: The early-ninth-century envelope is an approximate expansion of the Met catalogue date.
Place note: Neither a modern national centroid nor a Western Zhou capital can stand in for the missing findspot.
Reviewed evidence
A colossal lamassu made for the Northwest Palace joined image, inscription, and threshold to choreograph an imperial encounter.
Present-day locator: Nimrud archaeological site, Nineveh Governorate, Iraq
Date note: The reign-based approximate range is retained without a single inferred year.
Place note: The site point does not identify the sculpture’s original doorway within the palace.
Reviewed evidence
The glazed lion panel belonged to a repeated Processional Way programme whose colour and scale organised a ceremonial urban route.
Present-day locator: Babylon archaeological site near Hillah, Babil Governorate, Iraq
Date note: The reign-based approximate range is retained without a single inferred year.
Place note: The point anchors Babylon’s archaeological site, not the panel’s exact wall position.
Reviewed evidence
An Attic kouros marked an aristocratic grave through a formal standing body, while its exact workshop and grave remain unrecorded.
Present-day locator: Attica, Greece (regional locator only)
Date note: The collection record’s approximate range is retained without added precision.
Place note: The plotted Attica point is regional and must not be read as the statue’s workshop or grave.
Reviewed evidence
Ancient fittings from an elite ceremonial vehicle survive on a modern support; the map marks the discovery locality, not the exact tomb.
Present-day locator: Near Monteleone di Spoleto, Umbria, Italy
Date note: The machine bounds express the Met’s quarter-century catalogue wording and do not claim an exact production year.
Place note: The Met records a tomb near Monteleone; this is the locality coordinate, not a tomb pin.
Reviewed evidence
An official Panathenaic prize vessel carried valuable oil and a regulated civic image beyond the festival that commissioned it.
Present-day locator: Athens, Greece
Date note: The collection record gives an approximate year and no narrower date.
Place note: The city point anchors the festival commission, not an identified pottery workshop.
Reviewed evidence
The great Doric temple at Poseidonia was completed around 460 BCE, while its familiar Neptune and Hera names do not settle its dedication.
Present-day locator: Paestum archaeological park, Campania, Italy
Date note: The park’s “around” wording is retained as an approximate completion year.
Place note: The structured item’s modern label uses a Hera attribution; the coordinate is used without treating that dedication as certain.
Reviewed evidence
Embroidered backbent figures animate a mantle border, but the excavated bundle, named wearer and exact findspot are unknown.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives Peru but no excavated bundle or site
Date note: The machine bounds reproduce the Met’s published 450–175 BCE catalogue range.
Place note: The Paracas Peninsula or Wari Kayan cannot be assigned to this fragment without an object-specific excavation record.
Reviewed evidence
The theatre belonged to the Asklepios sanctuary, where performance formed part of festivals within a wider healing and pilgrimage system.
Present-day locator: Epidaurus archaeological site, Argolis, Greece
Date note: The machine interval conservatively encodes the whole fourth century; the authored qualifier “late” is not converted into an invented decade.
Place note: Structured monument coordinate for the theatre.
Reviewed evidence
A relic mound accumulated Mauryan beginnings, later enlargements and gateway sculpture; this route stop is explicitly multi-phase.
Present-day locator: Stupa 1, Sanchi, Madhya Pradesh, India
Date note: The bounded interval covers the early brick stupa, later enlargement and the gateway campaign around the first century CE.
Place note: The coordinate locates Stupa 1; it does not collapse the monument’s successive ancient and modern phases into one moment.
Reviewed evidence
Thousands of differentiated clay figures make standardisation and imperial hierarchy visible within a still-incompletely excavated mausoleum.
Present-day locator: Pit 1, Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor, Lintong District, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
Date note: UNESCO dates work on the mausoleum from 246 BCE until the emperor’s death in 210 BCE.
Place note: The structured coordinate identifies the terracotta-army site; it is not a survey-grade pin for every point within Pit 1.
Reviewed evidence
A line-type hummingbird is terrain rather than a portable image; its exact date is unknown within a broad Nasca-period envelope.
Present-day locator: Hummingbird figure, Nasca Pampa, Ica, Peru
Date note: The interval follows line-type figurative geoglyph chronology; it is not a direct date for the Hummingbird.
Reviewed evidence
An unnamed sitter uses an aged, politically charged portrait language; the original setting and findspot remain unpublished.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives no findspot or original setting
Date note: The bounded interval expands the Met’s stylistic “late first century BCE” attribution; no exact year is published.
Place note: No coordinate may be inferred from the broad Roman culture label or the present museum location.
Reviewed evidence
A painted bedroom opens into imaginary architecture while its modern reconstruction and the estate labour outside the image remain visible limits.
Present-day locator: Villa of P. Fannius Synistor, Boscoreale, Campania, Italy
Date note: The bounds reproduce the Met’s approximate 50–40 BCE catalogue range.
Place note: The coordinate identifies the excavated villa site, not the cubiculum wall panels in their present museum installation.
The surviving marble is a Roman-period copy whose body, material, and setting cannot be collapsed into the lost Hellenistic model.
Present-day locator: No verified production or findspot; collection culture is not a coordinate
Date note: Machine bounds date the surviving Roman marble; the authored label separately preserves the lost model’s second-century BCE attribution.
Place note: No point is plotted because the museum record publishes no workshop or findspot.
Reviewed evidence
A glazed earthenware tower equipped a tomb with an estate-like world; its excavated tomb and region are unrecorded.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives no tomb or regional findspot
Date note: The Met’s Eastern Han period range supplies the bounded interval for the authored broader wording.
Place note: A dynasty or modern country label is not a findspot, so the record remains unplotted.
Reviewed evidence
A fragmentary sacred head remains between Buddha and Jain Tirthankara identifications; Mathura is an attribution, not an excavated workshop.
Present-day locator: Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Date note: The century envelope represents the Met’s “about second century CE” attribution, not a dated archaeological context.
Place note: The coordinate is a locality proxy for the Met’s Mathura attribution, not a known workshop or findspot.
Reviewed evidence
A fixed forum monument spirals an official conquest narrative around a column dedicated in 113 CE.
Present-day locator: Forum of Trajan, Rome, Italy
Reviewed evidence
Local limestone, Palmyrene dress and Aramaic naming frame mourning within Roman rule; the exact family tomb is unknown.
Present-day locator: Palmyra archaeological site, Homs Governorate, Syria
Date note: The bounds reproduce the Met’s approximate 125–150 CE catalogue range.
Place note: Palmyra is secure at site level, but the collection record does not identify the relief’s precise family tomb.
Reviewed evidence
A monumental feline turns painted architecture and viewer movement into one urban experience; its mural-specific date remains approximate.
Present-day locator: Northern Avenue of the Dead, Teotihuacan, State of Mexico, Mexico
Date note: The interval is an editorial synthesis within the city’s documented architectural and mural-painting phases, not a direct laboratory date.
Place note: The coordinate locates the archaeological city, not the mural’s precise platform on the northern Avenue of the Dead.
Reviewed evidence
The Cave 5 relief binds deity, rock-cut route and Gupta court landscape without making every surrounding figure equally certain.
Present-day locator: Cave 5, Udayagiri Caves near Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India
Date note: The source supports an early-fifth-century Gupta setting at Udayagiri; a finer date for the relief remains a scholarly reconstruction.
Place note: The structured coordinate locates the cave complex; Cave 5 remains the authored on-site locator.
Reviewed evidence
The Cave 1 painting builds bodhisattva presence through prepared plaster, dim space and a viewer’s approach.
Present-day locator: Cave 1, Ajanta Caves, Maharashtra, India
Date note: The late-fifth-century envelope is bounded by the institutional cave chronology, not a direct date for this painted surface.
Place note: The coordinate locates the Ajanta cave complex; Cave 1 is the authored locator within it.
A mould-made vessel materialises an individual-looking face for ritual use; its original valley, settlement and tomb are unrecorded.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record gives only Peru’s North Coast
Date note: The machine bounds reproduce the Met’s published 500–800 CE catalogue range.
Place note: The broad North Coast attribution cannot support a valley centroid or tomb marker.
Reviewed evidence
Sixteen rulers encircle stone to legitimise Yax Pasaj through the founder; the inscriptional dedication fixes the monument in 776 CE.
Present-day locator: Original setting before Structure 16, Copán Acropolis, Copán Ruinas, Honduras
Place note: The original is now protected in the Copán Sculpture Museum; the coordinate represents its ancient acropolis setting.
Reviewed evidence
Checkerboard cumbi cloth links body, state reward and controlled weaving; possible modern countries cannot locate its workshop or wearer.
Present-day locator: Unknown; the collection record lists Argentina, Bolivia, Chile or Peru
Date note: The machine bounds reproduce the Met’s published 1400–1535 CE catalogue range.
Place note: Four present-day countries are a catalogue geography, not evidence for one ancient workshop, storehouse, battlefield or wearer.
Reviewed evidence
A folded deerskin history maps names, rites and dynasties; its route pin is only a regional production proxy, never a workshop claim.
Present-day locator: La Mixteca cultural region across parts of present-day Oaxaca, Puebla and Guerrero, Mexico
Date note: The NEH identifies it as a fifteenth-century manuscript; the British Museum collection record uses a broader 1200–1521 catalogue range.
Place note: The British Museum gives La Mixteca as production place; this representative regional coordinate has roughly 200 km uncertainty and is not a workshop.
Reviewed evidence
A monumental Mexica time-and-power relief was excavated in 1790; its proposed date, patron, orientation and use remain disputed.
Present-day locator: Plaza Mayor/Zócalo, Mexico City, Mexico
Date note: Institutional proposals include 1479, but the chapter preserves a broader range because date and patron remain debated.
Place note: The Zócalo coordinate represents the 1790 Plaza Mayor discovery context, not a measured excavation trench or proven original installation.
Reviewed evidence
The methods room · before chronology
Transferable ways to look, research, compare, argue, and cite.

Open method
A practical method for turning close observation into an art-historical argument, tested step by step on Vincent van Gogh’s The Bedroom.
A transferable method, demonstrated with Van Gogh’s The Bedroom

Open method
Learn how to build a comparative art-history argument in which every paragraph analyses both works, using Hokusai and Hiroshige as a worked example.
A transferable comparison method, demonstrated with Hokusai and Hiroshige

Open method
Learn how art-historical periods are built, dated, and revised—and how survival, collecting, and cataloguing shape the histories we inherit.
Cross-period method; examples c. 1961 BCE–1832 CE · Selected examples from Egypt, the Central Andes, the Low Countries, and Japan

Open method
A practical method for moving from a museum object record to a transparent source map, claim ledger, and defensible art-historical argument.
Cross-period method; examples c. 1550 BCE–1801 CE · Examples from Egypt, Aotearoa New Zealand, and France

Open method
A practical method for separating ownership history, authorship, legal title, ethical claims, and return when an artwork's public story changes.
Cross-period method; cases c. 1540–1984 · Cases from Nigeria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States

Open method
A practical method for identifying artworks, editions, pages, and digital files while keeping captions, citations, credits, rights, and alt text distinct.
Cross-period method; worked examples ca. 1525–1860 · Transferable method; worked examples from Iran, the Netherlands, and the United States
Before c. 500 CE
Many beginnings · object, image, ritual, city, body
Atlas volume 01
Connected visual cultures before about 500 CE, without one universal clock.

Selected archaeological sites in Africa, Europe, South America, Anatolia, and Japan
c. 2900–562 BCE · Selected cities and institutions around the Tigris and Euphrates
c. 2446–1050 BCE · The Memphite region, Thebes, and Karnak
c. 2700–1200 BCE · The Cyclades, Crete, Thera, and mainland Greece
c. 590 BCE–1st century CE · Attica, Poseidonia in southern Italy, and Epidaurus
c. 575 BCE–150 CE · Central Italy, Rome, the Bay of Naples, and Roman Syria
c. 2600 BCE–late 5th century CE · Harappan networks and selected sites in present-day Pakistan and India
Late 2nd millennium BCE–early 3rd century CE · Selected political centres in present-day Henan and Shaanxi
Selected Olmec, Teotihuacan, Maya, Mixtec, and Mexica works in Mesoamerica
Selected Chavín, Paracas, Nasca, Moche, and Inka works across the Andes
c. 300–1500
Routes and exchange · courts, faith, material movement
Atlas volume 02
Regional histories and routes of exchange from about 300 to 1500.

244/45–c. 600 CE · Selected Roman, Christian, Jewish, Egyptian, and West Asian settings
6th century–c. 1400 · Ravenna, Sinai, and Constantinople
c. 650–1250 · Selected works from Jerusalem, North Africa, al-Andalus, Samarqand, and Khurasan
c. 900–1400 · Selected Latin Christian and Jewish settings in present-day France, England, Spain, and Italy
c. 800–1600 · West Africa and the Sahel
c. 600–1400 · Selected temple and image worlds in present-day India and Bangladesh
c. 600–1400 · Selected sites in present-day Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam
618–1368 · Selected sites and objects associated with Tang, Song, and Yuan regimes and networks in present-day China
c. 600–1400 · Selected sites and objects associated with the Korean Peninsula and Japanese archipelago
Selected objects linked to Sweden, Sogdiana, Xinjiang, Tang China, and Dunhuang
c. 1400–1750
Courts and workshops · cities, empires, circulation
Atlas volume 03
Courts, workshops, cities, empires, and movement from about 1400 to 1750.

c. 1400–1527 · Florence, Urbino, Venice, and Rome
c. 1400–1600 · Burgundian-Habsburg Netherlands, German-speaking Europe, and mobile networks including London
c. 1450–1700 · Selected Ottoman court, urban, and provincial networks across Istanbul, Anatolia, the Balkans, and connected imperial territories
c. 1500–1700 · Selected Safavid Iranian and Mughal South Asian courts, workshops, cities, and connected routes
1368–early eighteenth century · Selected Ming and early Qing courts, Suzhou and Jiangnan networks, Jingdezhen workshops, and connected maritime routes
1392–1910, with emphasis on the fifteenth through eighteenth centuries · Selected Joseon court, shrine, painting, Buddhist, and kiln networks on the Korean Peninsula and connected routes
c. 1603/1615–1868 · Selected Edo, Kyoto, Osaka, Ise, and Nagasaki institutions and routes within Tokugawa Japan
c. 1450–1750 · Selected Kongo, Benin, Sierra Leonean, and Akan institutions and Atlantic routes
c. 1492–1750 · Selected Nahua and central Mexican, Tupinambá and eastern Brazilian, and Quechua and Peruvian routes
c. 1580–1750 · Rome, Madrid, Antwerp, Amsterdam, and Quito
c. 1700–1789 · Selected French, Saxon, Chinese, Coromandel, Sri Lankan, Indian Ocean, and Atlantic routes
c. 1750–1900
Public modernity · industry, exhibition, new media
Atlas volume 04
Public history, industrial modernity, new media, and competing modernisms from about 1750 to 1900.

c. 1750–1850 · Selected French, Haitian, Spanish, Mysorean, British, and United States institutions and objects
c. 1790–1850 · Selected German, French, Greek, British Atlantic, and United States objects, institutions, and colonial histories
c. 1848–1886 · Selected French, British, and Prussian-German works and labour systems; Paris, Hampstead, Ornans, and Upper Silesia
c. 1838–1875 · Paris; Britain; Crimea; Dagu in present-day Tianjin; Tséyi’ in the Navajo Nation; and United States survey archives
Selected works, 1869–c. 1880; independent exhibitions, 1874–1886 · Paris and its suburbs
1882–c. 1893 · Paintings by Cézanne, Van Gogh, and Seurat
France, late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
From c. 1900
Plural modernisms · institutions, bodies, networks
Atlas volume 05
Plural modernisms, decolonisation, institutions, bodies, networks, and global practice from about 1900.

c. 1909–1939 · Paris, Milan, Petrograd, Moscow, Vitebsk, Zurich, Berlin, Leipzig, and connected European networks
c. 1880–1984, with present-day provenance research · Gabon or Equatorial Guinea, Tahiti, the Kuba Kingdom, Paris, and connected colonial and museum networks
c. 1911–1943, with postwar institutional legacies · Mexico City, São Paulo, Lima, Montevideo, Madrid, Havana, and connected transatlantic and inter-American networks
c. 1890–1966, with later institutional afterlives · Freetown, Johannesburg and the Transvaal, Kampala, Lagos, Zaria, Nsukka, Kumasi, Accra, Khartoum, Bamako, Dakar, and connected African and diasporic networks
c. 1900–1945, with selected institutional afterlives · Kolkata, Santiniketan, Tokyo, colonial Korea, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hanoi, Batavia, and connected routes through Paris and other Asian cities
1945–1965, with selected institutional afterlives · United States, Soviet Union, divided Germany, Western and Eastern Europe, Brazil, India, Japan, Singapore and connected transnational exhibition routes
c. 1955–1975, with selected later historiographic corrections · Britain, United States, Brazil, Japan, the Philippines, continental Europe and connected transnational exhibition and correspondence networks
1964–1985, with selected earlier movement history and later archival interpretation · Japan, United States, Cuba, Brazil, and connected feminist, queer, Black, Chicana/o, performance, video, and exhibition networks
1945–2024, with case objects removed from their communities and polities in 1765, 1892, and 1897 · Sri Lanka, Netherlands, Nigeria, Benin, France, United States, Aotearoa New Zealand, and connected museum and community networks
c. 1982–2026, with the main frame beginning around 1989 · Gwangju, Kassel, Vienna, Berlin, New Delhi, St Lucia, Lagos, the Mediterranean, Skye and Raasay, New York, and distributed physical and digital networks
A completed public syllabus
Every chapter in the finite Atlas sequence is published. Any future curriculum change still requires complete source, image, rights, and Reader-record review before publication.