Skip to content

GeMarkt Journal · Practical guide

Is Odilon Redon Public Domain? A Print-and-File Guide

Redon's 12 named prints are public domain in the markets checked here; portfolio publication, exact impression, and museum file still need separate records.

By GeMarkt EditorialInternal source & rights check6 min readFrance, European Union, United Kingdom, Türkiye, and United States; publication, impression, and source-file status checked separatelyTwelve documented lithographic designs and impressions by Odilon Redon, 1879–1899

Rights check · reviewed

The short answer

Yes—for the 12 named lithographic designs and exact impressions documented here in France, the European Union, United Kingdom, Türkiye, and United States. The answer does not automatically clear every Redon painting, pastel, proof, state, or digital file.

Copyright and source-file status for established works by Odilon Redon
What is being checkedResultWhy
France, European Union & United KingdomPublic domainRedon died in 1916. The harmonised 70-year economic term had expired before 1987; the French Cour de cassation says that term normally absorbs the historic wartime extensions.
TürkiyePublic domainTürkiye applies a life-plus-70 economic-rights term. Redon’s established works are beyond it.
United StatesClear for the 12 published designs and impressions belowThe selected prints were issued before 1931, and their French source-country term had expired before the URAA restoration date. A private or uncertain proof still needs its own review.
Museum image or downloadCheck the exact impression and filePortfolio, plate, state, edition, physical impression, scan, and local derivative are distinct. Preserve the accession, source endpoint, and CC0 statement together.

This guide separates source-country term, U.S. publication and restoration, portfolio, plate, state, edition, exact impression, and institutional file. It makes no blanket worldwide claim.

This is a documented research summary, not legal advice. Copyright and moral-rights rules can vary by country and by the history of a particular work.

A smiling one-eyed cyclops with radiating hair in Odilon Redon’s lithograph The Misshapen Polyp Floated on the Shores
Odilon Redon, The Misshapen Polyp Floated on the Shores, a Sort of Smiling and Hideous Cyclops, 1883. Art Institute of Chicago, 1920.1580. Source · AIC · CC0 Public Domain Designation; resized to 1600 px and converted to WebP, no crop

What we’ll look at

When can a Redon print be reused, and why must its portfolio, state, edition, impression, and digital file remain separate?

The practical answer is yes for the 12 Odilon Redon print designs, impressions, and institutional files documented here—not automatically for every Redon work or every image online. Redon died in 1916, so his established works are beyond the ordinary economic-rights term in the European Union, France, United Kingdom, and Türkiye. The selected prints were also published in named portfolios or editions before 1931.

The word “print” hides several records:

  1. Redon’s underlying design and the country where its copyright term is being tested;
  2. the portfolio, book, or edition through which copies were distributed;
  3. a plate’s state and the edition to which an impression belongs;
  4. the exact physical sheet photographed by a museum;
  5. the museum file and GeMarkt’s local WebP derivative.

This is a research summary, not legal advice. It does not convert a surname into worldwide clearance.

The short answer is yes for the named print set

The ledger contains six Art Institute of Chicago impressions and six Cleveland Museum of Art impressions. Both institutions designate the exact files CC0. The selected designs date from 1879 to 1899 and belong to distributed projects including In Dreams, To Edgar Poe, Les Origines, Homage to Goya, The Temptation of Saint Anthony, and The Apocalypse of Saint John.

Cleveland’s records make the production distinctions visible. Closed Eyes is a trial proof before letters from an edition of 100. Light is state I/I from an edition of 50. The Marsh Flower and A Strange Juggler are state I/I impressions from the first edition of 50 of Homage to Goya. A Woman Clothed with the Sun is state I/I from an edition of 100 published by Ambroise Vollard.

Those labels belong to the photographed sheets. They should not be transferred to another impression merely because its image looks similar.

France and life plus 70 markets are clear

Article 1 of the EU term directive uses the author’s life plus 70 years. The UK and Türkiye apply the same ordinary economic duration for the uses addressed here. Redon died in 1916, placing his established works outside those terms before 1 January 1987.

France deserves an extra sentence because its code retains historical wartime-extension provisions. In 2007, France’s Cour de cassation held that the harmonised 70-year period normally covers those extensions, except where a longer protection period had already begun by 1 July 1995. Nothing in this selected 1879–1899 portfolio set supports such an exceptional longer term.

This economic-term conclusion does not erase France’s perpetual moral rights, attribution, integrity, trademark, privacy, ownership, access, or contract questions.

The US check has two branches

The first branch is publication. Copyright Office Circular 15A places works published before 1 January 1931 outside the maximum 95-year publication term in 2026. Here, portfolio titles, plate numbers, printers, publishers, states, and editions establish distribution more directly than a creation date or exhibition would.

The second branch is foreign-work restoration. Circular 38B explains that URAA restoration requires, among other things, a work that had not entered the source-country public domain through expiration of term. Redon’s ordinary French economic term ended before the 1 January 1996 restoration date. This selected published set therefore does not gain a U.S. restoration path from continued French term protection.

That reasoning is bounded. A different Redon object with an uncertain author, collaboration, first publication, private-proof status, or exceptional French term needs its own file. An unpublished drawing cannot borrow the history of a lithograph.

Portfolio plate state edition and impression are different

A portfolio is the issued group. A plate or lithographic stone produces a specific design. A state records intentional changes to the matrix. An edition describes a bounded printing project. An impression is one physical sheet pulled from the matrix. The digital image is a photograph or scan of that sheet.

The distinction prevents several common errors:

  • calling every impression “first state” because one museum’s sheet is first state;
  • presenting a single plate as the complete portfolio;
  • treating a later printing from a cancelled or altered matrix as a lifetime impression;
  • copying a catalogue scan while citing a museum’s CC0 file;
  • transferring paper colour, inscriptions, margins, or condition from one sheet to another.

The exact accession is therefore not decorative metadata. It is the bridge between print history and file provenance.

Is Redon’s eye balloon public domain

Redon’s 1882 design The Eye, Like a Strange Balloon Moves Towards Infinity is public domain in the markets checked here, and the exact AIC impression file in this ledger is designated CC0. It is plate one from the issued portfolio To Edgar Poe, not a free-floating drawing titled only “The Eye.”

The local file comes from AIC’s named IIIF endpoint for accession 1920.1570. It was resized to 960 pixels and converted to WebP without crop. A file from a book, auction, image library, or another institution needs its own terms even when it reproduces the same design.

The feature work follows the same logic. The Misshapen Polyp Floated on the Shores is plate three of eight from Les Origines. Its composition, AIC impression, IIIF JPEG, and local feature master are four linked but distinct facts.

Exact file terms still control the download

AIC permits commercial and non-commercial reuse of images carrying its CC0 Public Domain Designation. Cleveland makes eligible collection images and metadata available under CC0. Both policies are provider-level frameworks; the item record and exact endpoint identify whether the framework applies here.

The U.S. Copyright Office’s visual-arts compendium also separates a faithful scan from a restoration or alteration containing sufficient new authorship. This guide uses the museums’ affirmative exact-file records and documents only resizing and WebP conversion without crop.

If an upstream file, colour treatment, border, or photographed impression changes, the record must be re-reviewed. “Same Redon” is not file provenance.

Twelve CC0 impressions form the published set

The visual strip below is generated from the fail-closed registry. It contains exactly 12 unique object URLs, accessions, source endpoints, and local files. AIC contributes six impressions; Cleveland contributes six.

The set deliberately favours prints with clear portfolio or edition publication. Redon’s celebrated flower pastels and paintings may also be old enough in some markets, but this print ledger does not invent their U.S. histories or inherit file terms from these sheets.

A commercial reuse checklist

Before reusing a Redon image:

  1. Identify the design, portfolio or publication, plate number, date, and named creator roles.
  2. Check the economic term in every target country and retain the French source-country analysis for U.S. foreign-work questions.
  3. Save pre-1931 publication or edition evidence; do not substitute creation or display.
  4. Record state, edition, printer, publisher, paper, and exact impression where supplied.
  5. Save the item page, exact source-file URL, and current rights statement.
  6. Record every crop, tonal edit, restoration, border removal, composite, and format conversion.
  7. Check moral rights, attribution, integrity, trademark, endorsement, and platform rules separately.
  8. Re-review any replacement file or changed attribution.

Where Redon fits inside GeMarkt

This guide is editorial evidence, not a product announcement. GeMarkt currently has no Redon collection, product, wallpaper room, or download, so no such route is linked.

For context, read the Post-Impressionisms chapter, the cross-artist public-domain guide, and Public domain is not a free-for-all.

Rights-checked image ledger

A documented starting set

These files were selected from the holding institutions rather than from search-result copies. Each card keeps the artwork record, exact source file, provider statement and GeMarkt transformation visible as separate facts.

A smiling one-eyed cyclops with radiating hair in a lithograph from Les Origines

The Misshapen Polyp Floated on the Shores, a Sort of Smiling and Hideous Cyclops

1883 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1580

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 1600 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A large eyeball rising like a balloon above a distant landscape

The Eye, Like a Strange Balloon Moves Towards Infinity

1882 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1570

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

Floating eyeballs glowing amid dense black forms in a Redon lithograph

Everywhere Eyeballs Are Aflame

1888 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1642

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A winged horse restrained beneath dark enclosing forms in Captive Pegasus

Captive Pegasus

1889 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1661

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

Disembodied eyes floating like mollusks in a dark imaginary space

And That Eyes without Heads Were Floating Like Mollusks

1896 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1769

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A shadowed profile emerging below a strange blossoming form

Blossoming

1879 · Art Institute of Chicago · 1920.1556

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

An androgynous head with closed eyes above a lightly drawn landscape

Closed Eyes

1890; trial proof before letters, edition of 100 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1927.306

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A monumental pensive head looming above two small figures under an arch

Light

1893; state I/I, edition of 50 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1926.296

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A luminous woman standing within a dark radiating sun in Redon’s Apocalypse portfolio

A Woman Clothed with the Sun

1899; state I/I, edition of 100 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1926.140.6

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A mournful human head growing from a marsh flower in Homage to Goya

The Marsh Flower, a Sad Human Head

1885; state I/I, first edition of 50 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1927.344.2

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A strange solitary juggler balancing pale spheres against a black background

A Strange Juggler

1885; state I/I, first edition of 50 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1927.344.5

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

A fearful chimera with a humanlike face staring through deep shadow

The Chimera Gazed at All Things with Fear

1886; state I/I, edition of 50 · Cleveland Museum of Art · 1926.277

CC0 Public Domain Designation

Resized to 960 pixels wide and converted to WebP; no crop.

Sources and review method

We checked the artist chronology against museum records, treated each named jurisdiction separately, and recorded the provider policy for the image set. These sources support the legal framework and artist dates used above; the source file for any individual image still needs its own record.

  1. The Misshapen Polyp Floated on the Shores — Art Institute of Chicago. Feature design, portfolio and plate identity, impression accession, exact IIIF file, and CC0 status.
  2. Homage to Goya — Cleveland Museum of Art. Portfolio publication, printer, first edition of 50, complete-set context, and CC0 file status.
  3. Closed Eyes — Cleveland Museum of Art. Trial-proof, edition, printer, photographed-impression identity, and CC0 file status.
  4. Pourvoi n°04-12.138 — Cour de cassation. French authority that the harmonised 70-year term normally absorbs historic wartime extensions.
  5. Open Access Images — Art Institute of Chicago. Files labelled CC0 Public Domain Designation may be reused for commercial and non-commercial purposes.
  6. Open Access — Cleveland Museum of Art. Cleveland releases eligible collection images and metadata under CC0 for commercial and non-commercial reuse.
  7. Directive 2006/116/EC, Article 1 — EUR-Lex. The EU term for an artistic work is the author’s life plus 70 years.
  8. How long copyright lasts — UK Government. UK guidance gives 70 years after the author’s death for artistic works.
  9. Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic Works, Article 27 — WIPO Lex. The Turkish economic-rights term is the author’s life plus 70 years.
  10. Circular 15A: Duration of Copyright — U.S. Copyright Office. The 2026 term table places works published before 1931 outside the maximum 95-year publication term.
  11. Certain Unpublished, Unregistered Works Enter Public Domain — U.S. Copyright Office. Older unpublished works have a separate U.S. term analysis; discovery and first-publication history can matter.
  12. 17 U.S.C. Chapter 3, including §303 — U.S. Copyright Office. Section 303 states the transition rules and minimum 2002 or 2047 expiry floors for works that were unpublished on 1 January 1978.
  13. 17 U.S.C. §104A and Circular 38B — U.S. Copyright Office. Foreign-work restoration requires that the work was not already public domain through term expiry in its source country.
  14. Visual Artists: Publication — U.S. Copyright Office. Distribution can publish a visual artwork, while public display by itself does not establish publication.
  15. Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Chapter 900, §909.3(A) — U.S. Copyright Office. A purely faithful scan or “slavish copy” does not add registrable authorship, while substantial restoration or alteration can require a separate analysis.
  16. Copyright notice: digital images, photographs and the internet — UK Intellectual Property Office. A digital image can require a separate rights and website-terms check even when its subject is old.

Editorial record

About this article

Publisher
GeMarkt
Published
Reviewed
Internal source & rights check. Conducted by GeMarkt Research Review. This is an internal editorial check—not independent peer review.
Source standard
Rights guide source standardSeparates the underlying work from the source file, records the review date, and links the evidence used for the conclusion.

Found a claim that needs checking? Report a factual error.