GeMarkt Journal · Reference
Is it public domain? A work-specific guide to 16 artists
A direct 16-artist comparison that separates the ordinary Türkiye/EU term, US publication evidence, and the terms attached to the exact digital file.

What we’ll look at
What can an artist's death date establish, and what still requires work-level US publication evidence and an exact-file check?
The short answer
An artist is not “public domain” as a person. A particular work can be public domain in a particular country on a particular date. The photograph, scan, restoration, or download used to reproduce that work is a separate decision.
The table below answers one limited question: when did the ordinary author-based term end in Türkiye and the European Union? The final-column links identify a named work and provider record from which review can begin; the link alone does not establish US publication or permission to reuse the file. This is general information, not legal advice.
What the table does and does not show
Türkiye’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism describes the ordinary economic-rights term as the author’s life plus 70 years, calculated from the first day of the year after death. Directive 2006/116/EC, Article 1 gives the same ordinary term in the European Union.
Those rules answer an author-term question. They do not by themselves answer whether an old work was published in the United States, whether a special category applies, whether attribution is correct, or whether a particular file may be downloaded and reused under its provider’s current terms.
Sixteen names, one limited comparison
“Ordinary term ended” means only that the life-plus-70 calculation has run. “Named work/file starting point” identifies the linked object and provider record; it is neither a US publication finding nor a verdict for the artist’s output.
| Artist | Death | Ordinary Türkiye/EU term | Named work/file starting point — not a US result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leonardo da Vinci | 1519 | from 1 Jan 1590 | Ginevra de’ Benci — NGA |
| Vincent van Gogh | 1890 | from 1 Jan 1961 | The Bedroom — AIC |
| Georges Seurat | 1891 | from 1 Jan 1962 | A Sunday on La Grande Jatte—1884 — AIC |
| Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec | 1901 | from 1 Jan 1972 | Moulin Rouge: La Goulue — The Met |
| Paul Cézanne | 1906 | from 1 Jan 1977 | Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Viaduct — The Met |
| Edgar Degas | 1917 | from 1 Jan 1988 | The Dance Class — The Met |
| Gustav Klimt | 1918 | from 1 Jan 1989 | The Kiss, Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, Death and Life |
| Pierre-Auguste Renoir | 1919 | from 1 Jan 1990 | A Girl with a Watering Can — NGA |
| Amedeo Modigliani | 1920 | from 1 Jan 1991 | Jeanne Hébuterne — The Met |
| Claude Monet | 1926 | from 1 Jan 1997 | Woman with a Parasol — NGA |
| Alphonse Mucha | 1939 | from 1 Jan 2010 | Job, 1898 — Library of Congress |
| Leonetto Cappiello | 1942 | from 1 Jan 2013 | Chocolat Klaus, 1903 — Library of Congress |
| Ohara Koson | 1945 | from 1 Jan 2016 | Cockatoo with Pomegranate, 1927 — Rijksmuseum |
| Hiroshi Yoshida | 1950 | from 1 Jan 2021 | No US or exact-file result in this overview |
| Henri Matisse | 1954 | from 1 Jan 2025 | No US or exact-file result in this overview |
| Kawase Hasui | 1957 | not yet; ordinary term runs through 2027 | No US or exact-file result in this overview |
Why any United States result stays work-specific
The US Copyright Office’s Circular 15A separates works by when and how federal protection was secured. 17 U.S.C. §303 gives a separate transition rule for certain works created before 1978 that had not been published or copyrighted by then. The artist’s death year cannot replace that history.
Publication is also a legal term, not a synonym for “painted,” “sold,” or “shown.” The Copyright Office states that public display by itself does not constitute publication. A dated poster printed and distributed in copies can offer strong publication evidence; a painting known from an exhibition date may still need more.
In 2026, a work proved to have been published by the end of 1930 is outside the longest 95-year publication term described in Circular 15A. That moving cutoff is useful only after the publication fact has been established.
The file is a separate decision
The European Union’s DSM Directive 2019/790, Article 14 addresses non-original reproductions after the visual artwork’s term has expired. In the United States, the Copyright Office’s Compendium, section 909.3(A) says a merely faithful scan or “slavish copy” lacks the authorship required for registration.
Neither source means every download is interchangeable. A creative photograph, restoration, new edition, crop, composite, website contract, access rule, trademark, or moral-rights issue can require a separate check. Save the exact object page, exact file URL or identifier, displayed rights statement, review date, and every local transformation.
Sources and review date
This comparison was reviewed on 22 August 2026. Its baseline sources are the Turkish Ministry page, the EU term directive, the EU DSM directive, US Copyright Office Circular 15A, sections 101 and 303 of Title 17, and the item-level institutional records linked in the table. If a provider replaces a file or changes its terms, re-check that file before a new use.
Editorial record
About this article
- Author
- Publisher
- GeMarkt
- Published
- Updated
- Reviewed
- Internal source & rights check. Conducted by GeMarkt Research Review. This is an internal editorial check—not independent peer review.
- Source standard
- Rights guide source standardSeparates the underlying work from the source file, records the review date, and links the evidence used for the conclusion.
Found a claim that needs checking? Report a factual error.