Skip to content

GeMarkt Journal · Reference

Is it public domain? A work-specific guide to 16 artists

A direct 16-artist comparison that separates the ordinary Türkiye/EU term, US publication evidence, and the terms attached to the exact digital file.

By GeMarkt EditorialInternal source & rights check5 min readTürkiye, European Union, and United States; exact-file terms checked separatelyStatus reviewed on 22 August 2026
Editorial diagram separating the artwork, the country where it will be used, and the exact digital file
A public-domain decision has three layers: the named work, the territory, and the exact file. Source · GeMarkt-created AI-assisted editorial graphic

What we’ll look at

What can an artist's death date establish, and what still requires work-level US publication evidence and an exact-file check?

The short answer

An artist is not “public domain” as a person. A particular work can be public domain in a particular country on a particular date. The photograph, scan, restoration, or download used to reproduce that work is a separate decision.

The table below answers one limited question: when did the ordinary author-based term end in Türkiye and the European Union? The final-column links identify a named work and provider record from which review can begin; the link alone does not establish US publication or permission to reuse the file. This is general information, not legal advice.

What the table does and does not show

Türkiye’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism describes the ordinary economic-rights term as the author’s life plus 70 years, calculated from the first day of the year after death. Directive 2006/116/EC, Article 1 gives the same ordinary term in the European Union.

Those rules answer an author-term question. They do not by themselves answer whether an old work was published in the United States, whether a special category applies, whether attribution is correct, or whether a particular file may be downloaded and reused under its provider’s current terms.

Sixteen names, one limited comparison

“Ordinary term ended” means only that the life-plus-70 calculation has run. “Named work/file starting point” identifies the linked object and provider record; it is neither a US publication finding nor a verdict for the artist’s output.

Artist Death Ordinary Türkiye/EU term Named work/file starting point — not a US result
Leonardo da Vinci 1519 from 1 Jan 1590 Ginevra de’ Benci — NGA
Vincent van Gogh 1890 from 1 Jan 1961 The Bedroom — AIC
Georges Seurat 1891 from 1 Jan 1962 A Sunday on La Grande Jatte—1884 — AIC
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec 1901 from 1 Jan 1972 Moulin Rouge: La Goulue — The Met
Paul Cézanne 1906 from 1 Jan 1977 Mont Sainte-Victoire and the Viaduct — The Met
Edgar Degas 1917 from 1 Jan 1988 The Dance Class — The Met
Gustav Klimt 1918 from 1 Jan 1989 The Kiss, Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, Death and Life
Pierre-Auguste Renoir 1919 from 1 Jan 1990 A Girl with a Watering Can — NGA
Amedeo Modigliani 1920 from 1 Jan 1991 Jeanne Hébuterne — The Met
Claude Monet 1926 from 1 Jan 1997 Woman with a Parasol — NGA
Alphonse Mucha 1939 from 1 Jan 2010 Job, 1898 — Library of Congress
Leonetto Cappiello 1942 from 1 Jan 2013 Chocolat Klaus, 1903 — Library of Congress
Ohara Koson 1945 from 1 Jan 2016 Cockatoo with Pomegranate, 1927 — Rijksmuseum
Hiroshi Yoshida 1950 from 1 Jan 2021 No US or exact-file result in this overview
Henri Matisse 1954 from 1 Jan 2025 No US or exact-file result in this overview
Kawase Hasui 1957 not yet; ordinary term runs through 2027 No US or exact-file result in this overview

Why any United States result stays work-specific

The US Copyright Office’s Circular 15A separates works by when and how federal protection was secured. 17 U.S.C. §303 gives a separate transition rule for certain works created before 1978 that had not been published or copyrighted by then. The artist’s death year cannot replace that history.

Publication is also a legal term, not a synonym for “painted,” “sold,” or “shown.” The Copyright Office states that public display by itself does not constitute publication. A dated poster printed and distributed in copies can offer strong publication evidence; a painting known from an exhibition date may still need more.

In 2026, a work proved to have been published by the end of 1930 is outside the longest 95-year publication term described in Circular 15A. That moving cutoff is useful only after the publication fact has been established.

The file is a separate decision

The European Union’s DSM Directive 2019/790, Article 14 addresses non-original reproductions after the visual artwork’s term has expired. In the United States, the Copyright Office’s Compendium, section 909.3(A) says a merely faithful scan or “slavish copy” lacks the authorship required for registration.

Neither source means every download is interchangeable. A creative photograph, restoration, new edition, crop, composite, website contract, access rule, trademark, or moral-rights issue can require a separate check. Save the exact object page, exact file URL or identifier, displayed rights statement, review date, and every local transformation.

Sources and review date

This comparison was reviewed on 22 August 2026. Its baseline sources are the Turkish Ministry page, the EU term directive, the EU DSM directive, US Copyright Office Circular 15A, sections 101 and 303 of Title 17, and the item-level institutional records linked in the table. If a provider replaces a file or changes its terms, re-check that file before a new use.

Editorial record

About this article

Publisher
GeMarkt
Published
Updated
Reviewed
Internal source & rights check. Conducted by GeMarkt Research Review. This is an internal editorial check—not independent peer review.
Source standard
Rights guide source standardSeparates the underlying work from the source file, records the review date, and links the evidence used for the conclusion.

Found a claim that needs checking? Report a factual error.